| How
well does the chip really work?
It shouldn’t happen to a dog – happy together after their
ordeals, Becky the boxer and Jasper the podenco are pulling through nicely.
On
a recent Saturday evening a dog belonging to a friend of mine escaped
from her garden. Hours were spent searching for him and posters put up
showing his picture and giving a contact telephone number. She did all
the normal things one does when a dog is lost.
The dog has a microchip so first thing on Monday morning she intended
to inform a vet of his loss and get his details put onto the Lost Dogs
section of Zoocan, the company licensed in the Canaries to operate the
microchipping database.
Rather than wait until Monday I offered to post the dog on the Zoocan
website as lost on her behalf. Any member of the public with a registered
animal may do this. All they need do is put in the animal’s chip
number and their own NIE number. Obviously the two must correspond with
the details in the data base!
Fortunately, I took the precaution of checking the dog’s details
on the database before posting him as being lost. To my horror I found
that, despite the fact that my friend’s NIE and the dog’s
chip number opened the page with details of the dog, nothing else had
been changed. His details still showed the name of his previous owner,
his address and telephone number.
The point here is that the dog’s previous owner had abandoned him
and my friend, in rescuing him from a miserable and short life on the
streets, had had his microchip properly transferred into her name as the
legally recognised new owner.
Had this dog been picked up by the police or taken to a vet, and his chip
scanned, they would have immediately contacted the original owner –
the man who had abandoned him!
I am pleased to report that the dog arrived home of his own accord on
the Monday morning but, aside from my friend’s relief, that is hardly
the point.
This is not the first time I have come across such errors. On three occasions
I have known a particular vet to take the money, fill in the forms for
the veterinary college and Zoocan, which the owner signs, and then not
register them. Sloppiness or what?
The moral of this story is that you should be aware that you can access
the data base yourself to verify the registered details of your animal
or, if you do not have access to a computer, get your vet to give you
a printout of those details.
It is a sorry state of affaires when it appears to be necessary to take
such steps.
Following my article in the last issue numerous people have asked me
how Becky the malnourished stray boxer and Jasper the cruelly injured
Canarian hunting dog are getting on.
Happily, Becky is putting on weight and still wolfing food down as if
she thinks she is a labrador, those notorius foodies. I think it will
be quite some time before she realises that food will be presented to
her on a regular basis.
Jasper is now able to walk, with a limp, on his worst injured leg. The
vet is pleased with his progress and doesn’t want to see him for
another two weeks.
He is a totally different dog to the one I picked up. He needed peace
and quiet, away from other dogs for a few days, so was kept in a bathroom.
As he began to feel better he joined the other dogs though he is not allowed
much exercise. He has now become quite playful and true to his age, being
something of a lager lout but it is wonderful to see after the depressed,
infected dog of a couple of weeks ago.
Becky and he will often share a chair in the living room. Both are extremely
good mixers with other dogs and hopefully both are on their way to full
recovery, their past suffering just a distant memory.
|